The C. H. Best part is, I don't even recognise to whom. Coming photographic equipment buyers? Early cameras? To Sony's ain Exmor-equipped point-and-shoots, which got this instead of a considerable shopping drive? In whatever case, this is dumb. Give us count the ways!

1. It's a "artificial image"
2. The "traditional device" side of this scene looks like a city district; the Exmor period of play has a big, bright, better-looking structure in it
3. The left body was snapped done a same fast F2.4 genus Lens. The right? UN agency knows, since it's not real.
4. We have no view how long the exposure was. It could've been cardinal proceedings at ISO 50, for every we know.
5. It's a "artificial image"

If your new sensors square measure really, truly good in low light, there square measure really unsubdivided construction to show that, no Photoshopping needful. Come on guys, you're not commerce a Slap Chop. [BoingBoing Gadgets]

The C. H. Best part is, I don't even recognise to whom. Coming photographic equipment buyers? Early cameras? To Sony's ain Exmor-equipped point-and-shoots, which got this instead of a considerable shopping drive? In whatever case, this is dumb. Give us count the ways!

1. It's a "artificial image"
2. The "traditional device" side of this scene looks like a city district; the Exmor period of play has a big, bright, better-looking structure in it
3. The left body was snapped done a same fast F2.4 genus Lens. The right? UN agency knows, since it's not real.
4. We have no view how long the exposure was. It could've been cardinal proceedings at ISO 50, for every we know.
5. It's a "artificial image"

If your new sensors square measure really, truly good in low light, there square measure really unsubdivided construction to show that, no Photoshopping needful. Come on guys, you're not commerce a Slap Chop. [BoingBoing Gadgets]